dontjudge.org.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the dontjudge.org.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host dontjudge.org.uk. Currently, hosted in - and its service provider is - .

the related websites

thestudentroom.co.uk searchlight.com kitcattnohr.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

you appear to be running quite an old browser and as a result you may not be able to view this site correctly. upgrade to a different browser or install google chrome frame to experience this site if you're having any difficulty. don't judge my family the campaign against marriage tax breaks and allowance home about volunteer quizzes mothers’ quiz valentine’s quiz blog case studies press petition 24 better ideas david cameron says he wants to “send a signal” that marriage is better than any other kind of relationship. he intends to do this by giving certain types of married couples a tax break. sign up to send a signal back – don’t judge my family. by giving £200 to married couples with a breadwinner and a homemaker, david cameron is discriminating against: the one in four children growing up in a single parent family widows and widowers people who leave abusive relationships working parents people who choose not to be married sign up now to show david cameron that his promotion of a fantasy 1950s family has no place in modern britain. sign our petition to register your support latest news 23/7/15 - tories beware the tax credits nudge tories say marriage tax breaks will keep families together. so won’t the two-child tax credit policy split them up? this article was published in progress online today: ‘there is something special about marriage,’ said david cameron on one of the occasions he announced one of his ‘nudges’ – the marriage tax allowance. gordon brown had axed the tax break, then called the married man’s allowance, back in 1999 in favour of a new system of tax credits to lift families out of poverty. conservatives and rightwing thinktanks regularly cite the correlation, while neglecting to question causality, between the length of relationship and existence of a wedding certificate. any marriage, it would seem, is better than no marriage. but not all marriages are equal. the ideal tory marriage, the one rewarded by marriage tax beaks, has a spouse who goes out to work and a spouse who stays at home or works part time. the tax breaks are only paid to married couples (and those in civil partnerships) with a homemaker who transfers his or, more likely, her tax-free allowance to the basic rate taxpaying breadwinner. marriages where both partners work and pay tax or where neither works are not rewarded, whether or not they have children. it is not, as the name suggests, paid to the widowed, separated or single or cohabiting couples, no matter how stable and committed they are. limiting child tax credits to two children further defines this ideal tory marriage. not only does cameron want to ‘ benefit those who choose to stay at home or work part-time in order to care for their families ’, he’s now setting out how many children this family should have. if he drew a picture it would surely look like an illustration from a 1964 peter and jane story with a mummy at home and daddy who goes out to work and two children. even by the 1970s peter and jane’s mummy went to work. (more…) 3/12/14 - ten years on civil partnerships should be for all… rebecca steinfeld and charles keidan are expecting their first baby. like many other couples they want to demonstrate their commitment to each other and ensure that their new family has legal (and financial) protection. but they don’t want to get married. for rebecca and charles that’s because, as feminists, they reject traditional, “patriarchal” marriage. we’ve heard many other reasons from many other people (you can tell us yours by signing our declaration .) they woud like to enter a civil partnership. but they can’t, because, as the registar declared when they went to give “notice of intention” to form a civil partnership, they’re not the same sex. the civil partnership act states it is only for “same-sex couples”. rebecca and charles are challenging this in court using judicial review. we will be particularly interested to see how the government will defend this now same sex couples can choose to marry or form a civil partnership. previous attemps by oppositve sex couples were made (we think) before same legislation was changed so sex couple could get married. and on friday, tim loughton mp is proposing a private members bill that would remove the word “same-sex” from the civil partnership act. it’s very unlikely to get anywhere because most of tim’s conservative colleagues won’t agree with him and labour mps, who we hope will, are unlikely to support a bill proposed by a conservative mp. (it’s also unusual for us to be supporting rather than clashing with tim loughton who’s a big fan of the marriage tax allowance…). julianne marriott, spokesperson for don’t judge my family, said: “we believe that great relationships come in all shapes and sizes but the best ones are built on commitment and partnership. opening up civil partnerships to everyone would give couples who choose not to marry the option to ensure their relationship and family still received the same legal and financial protection as if they were married.” if you want to support rebecca and charles you can sign their petition (but make sure you sign ours too!) and you can contribute to their legal costs . we’ll let you know more when we do. 23/9/14 - labour to scrap marriage tax allowance labour has confirmed its pledge to scrap the marriage tax allowance ! this is great news, and of course we’re delighted that now two major political parties have agreed not to spend scarce public money judging families. labour would spend the money (approximately £700m per year) on funding a 10p starting rate of tax. the lib dems would spend the money on childcare. last year, we put forward 24 better ideas to spend the money earmarked for a marriage tax break. we believe that in these tough times, the government should be helping families not judging them. you can find out more about why the marriage tax break is a poor use of public money and a judgmental, outdated policy here and sign up to our campaign here . 3/9/14 - lib dems would scrap marriage tax breaks today the liberal democrats, longtime critics of the marriage tax allowance, have joined the labour party in confirming they will scrap the tax break and use the money to actually help families by funding extra childcare. nick clegg has been a frequent critic of marriage tax breaks. despite this he committed lib dem mps to abstaining at a vote which allowed conservatives to win the vote and therefore introduce marriage tax breaks. the marriage tax allowance will only go to one in five families with children – those with two parents who are married and where one doesn’t work (or doesn’t pay tax) and has been widely criticised for trying to stigmatise unmarried, divorced and widowed parents. last year don’t judge my family held a call for evidence – asking people, organisations and academics for better ways of spending £700m (the estimated cost of the marriage tax break). childcare came out top, along with providing relationship counselling, flexible working hours and helping couples make a will. julianne marriott, of campaign group don’t judge my family, said: “we’re really pleased to hear the liberal democrats have publicly announced they’ll be scrapping the marriage tax allowance. however if they had voted against, rather than abstaining, earlier this year there would be no marriage tax allowance to scrap. what we’d really like to hear is that the marriage tax allowance is a “red line” issue for the liberal democrats – one which they would not be willing to compromise or abstain from if they form a coalition government in 2015.” 21/8/14 - one speech; two messages the prime minister announced a “family test” for new government policies this week. his used his speech to affirm his belief in the importance of marriage and marriage tax breaks, but also praised (some) single parents, conceded that marriage might not be for all and acknowledged that in cases of domestic violence safety was more important than a

URL analysis for dontjudge.org.uk

http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/labour-to-scrap-marriage-tax-allowance/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/dont_judge-24_better_ideas.pdf
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/tories-beware-the-tax-credits-nudge/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/privacy-cookies/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/quiz/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/lib-dems-would-scrap-marriage-tax-breaks/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/about-the-policy/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/contact/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/category/blog/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/alternatives-to-the-marriage-tax-allowance/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/tories-beware-the-tax-credits-nudge/#more-1149
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/in-the-news/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/marriage-tax-break-debated-today/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/us/
http://www.dontjudge.org.uk/marriage-is-best-even-when-it-isnt/
telegraph.co.uk
progressonline.org.uk
services.parliament.uk
dailymail.co.uk
gov.uk
pinknews.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
dontjudge.org.uk

Registrant:
HoldMyPlace

Registrant type:
UK Individual

Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.

Data validation:
Nominet was not able to match the registrant's name and/or address against a 3rd party source on 20-Jan-2013

Registrar:
123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]
URL: http://www.123-reg.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 20-Jan-2013
Expiry date: 20-Jan-2019
Last updated: 13-Jan-2017

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns1.echhosting.com
ns2.echhosting.com

WHOIS lookup made at 06:40:29 15-Sep-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS dontjudge.org.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION HoldMyPlace

TYPE
UK Individual

ADDRESS
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.
Data validation:
Nominet was not able to match the registrant's name and/or address against a 3rd party source on 20-Jan-2013

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR 123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]

  CREATED 2013-01-20

  CHANGED 2017-01-13

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS1.ECHHOSTING.COM 83.223.125.155

  NS2.ECHHOSTING.COM 83.223.125.156

  NAME dontjudge.org.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .